Both sides have been accused of war crimes, but the RSF in particular has developed a reputation for its brutality. Despite being pushed out of the capital of Khartoum in March, the paramilitary force has solidified and expanded its control elsewhere in the country, seizing territory along the Libyan and Egyptian borders last month. The group has also continued to dig its heels into the Western Darfur region, where it has laid siege on the city of El Fasher.
At the same time, the paramilitary has sought to shore up its political authority in the areas it occupies. Late last month, RSF leader Gen. Mohamed Hamdan “Hemedti” Dagalo declared a rival government, sparking fears that his forces may be laying the groundwork for an eventual partition of Sudan. According to Hemedti, the alternate civilian-led government will be led by 15 people and include regional governors. Mohammed Hassan al-Taishi, a former official in Sudan’s defunct transitional government, was named prime minister.
Both the African Union and the Arab League condemned the creation of Hemedti’s government, arguing it would continue to fragment the country further and prolong the violence. The Sudanese government also rejected the RSF’s declaration of a “New Sudan,” describing the body as an “illegitimate entity declared by the terrorist militia” and urging the international community not to recognize it. Led by Gen. Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, the Sudanese army currently controls most of north and east Sudan, including the capital of Khartoum and Port Sudan, a city on the Red Sea.
But Burhan’s forces are at risk of losing their last remaining foothold in the western Darfur region, where the RSF has intensified its attacks since losing Khartoum. Much of the fighting has focused on El Fasher, the capital of North Darfur, which is currently government-controlled but has been under siege by Hemedti’s troops for more than 16 months. In June, the International Organization for Migration reported that more than 1 million people had fled the city since the start of the conflict amid a near-constant barrage of drones and artillery attacks.
The civilian population of El Fasher also faces a rapidly worsening hunger crisis. The United Nations World Food Program reported Tuesday that it has been unable to deliver aid to the city by road for more than a year, as combatants block all available routes. “Everyone in El Fasher is facing a daily struggle to survive,” Eric Perdison, WFP’s regional director for eastern and southern Africa, said in a statement. “People’s coping mechanisms have been completely exhausted by over two years of war. Without immediate and sustained access, lives will be lost.”
Meanwhile, since mid-June, the city and surrounding areas have been riddled with a cholera outbreak. The United Nations has reported more than 2,000 cases of cholera in the Darfur region, leading to at least 80 deaths as of July 30.
The blockade on El Fasher had compounded a dire nationwide humanitarian crisis. Sudan is currently the world’s only declared famine, with more than 24 million people facing acute food insecurity and an estimated 637,000 facing “catastrophic levels of hunger.” Meanwhile, the large flow of refugees out of conflict zones has stretched local governments and aid groups to their limits. Sudan has the world’s largest internal displacement crisis, with more than 8 million people displaced within the country’s borders, while nearly 4 million people have fled into neighboring countries.
Getting desperately needed supplies to Sudanese civilians is a “two-part problem,” Michelle Gavin, a senior fellow for Africa policy studies at the Council on Foreign Relations, told TMD. For one, humanitarian appeals for the war-torn country are often “grotesquely underfunded,” she said, meaning that not enough aid enters the country to begin with. But on top of that, the two armed factions have stoked a “man-made” food crisis in a deliberate effort to deny the other side supplies.
“These are forces that deliberately burned fields. The SAF continues to deny humanitarian access through all kinds of administrative hoops and hurdles,” Gavin said. Meanwhile, “the RSF denied humanitarian access and has held El Fasher under siege for months and months and months. So both of these parties are culpable for violating basic humanitarian norms around ensuring civilians don’t starve to death as a weapon of war.”
But weaponizing hunger is one in a list of war crimes committed during this war. Reports of widespread sexual violence, extrajudicial killings, and abductions have emerged across multiple regions. And in Darfur, the site of a genocide in the early 2000s, the RSF is carrying out a campaign of systematic ethnic violence against indigenous communities like the Masalit.
In January, then-Secretary of State Anthony Blinken formally declared the atrocities a genocide. “The RSF and allied militias have systematically murdered men and boys—even infants—on an ethnic basis, and deliberately targeted women and girls from certain ethnic groups for rape and other forms of brutal sexual violence,” he said of the decision. But unlike the Bush administration’s 2004 genocide declaration in Darfur, today’s massacres in Sudan have received very little attention from the White House.
The situation ultimately reflects a “political failing on the part of the United States,” Mark Choate, a former defense attaché in Sudan and professor of history at Brigham Young University, told TMD. The war began during the Biden administration, but it was inherited by the Trump administration, which has yet to appoint a special envoy to Sudan. Meanwhile, the current administration’s moves to gut U.S. foreign aid have exacerbated the country’s humanitarian crisis.
Part of the international community’s apparent indifference appears to stem from the correct assertion that both sides, including the Sudanese army, have committed crimes over the course of the conflict. “There is a perception that both sides are bad; therefore, we shouldn’t work with either,” Liam Karr, the Africa team lead for the American Enterprise Institute’s Critical Threats Project, told TMD. “But it is important for the U.S. and for other partners to remain engaged. Just because they are both bad partners does not mean there isn’t a role to be played.”
